Social media marketing for political campaigns must be part of a cohesive campaign strategy that is consistent across all media channels including traditional media. A social media strategy must not be an afterthought, aimed at engaging only the tech-savvy voters. More specifically, with regard to digital electioneering on the social media platform, it is essential to focus on the following points to ensure a successful engagement with the public (including voters).
•Showcase the Candidate: It will be worthwhile to introduce each candidate through their own blog. The candidate can use the blog to share personal snippets like family background, ideas, beliefs and reasons for subscribing to the party’s views and agenda. Remember that, while the political party’s memorandum may be available elsewhere on the site, the candidate’s own reasons for supporting the party’s beliefs can be an effective way to lend a personal touch and perhaps, instantly reach out to potential voters.
•Highlight Contributions: Ensure to highlight not only the candidate’s official achievements as a member of the party but also his/her participation in activities of a more social nature (volunteering for charities, videos of interactions with the people, podcast of speeches given, etc.). As online media is cost-effective, there’s a tendency to go overboard with featuring accomplishments. Remember to keep bragging to a minimum and aim to project the candidate as a potential public servant.
•Engage in Two-way Dialog: As with any campaign, failure is imminent, if there’s no “live” interaction. The comments and other responses from the people must be responded to in minimum time, and negative comments, contrary views with undertones of protest, etc., must be responded to effectively and sensitively. There’s no use having a static presence on a social networking site as fan following thrives on real-time updates (microblogs) and rapid responses. If there are questions or comments that haven’t been responded to in weeks, it is more than likely that people will lose interest in participating. In fact, the lack of response on a social site may be misconstrued as lack of seriousness on the part of the candidate in addressing issues concerning the people. That would do more harm, than not having a social media presence at all.
•Leverage the Online Connection in the Real World: Hosting debates and getting public opinion on any campaign matter is easier to do, once you establish your presence on social media; it gives you a ready group of people to reach out to instantly. It becomes easier to organize local events, fundraising events, rallies, etc., and gauge responses.
•Understand your Online Popularity: A candidate’s online popularity or number of followers on a social networking site seldom translates into actual votes. It certainly does not guarantee a win in the elections. Like all other campaign events, it is merely a great way of reaching out to people and spreading and reinforcing messages.
•Adapt your Interactions: It is important to take into consideration both local and global sensibilities while voicing your presence on the web. Do not make hasty or offensive comments and certainly do not react negatively to any person or group of people, lest it becomes a self-destructive hate campaign. Do not discourage difference of opinion or protests. If you notice that not many people are interested in a certain section of the site but are more active in certain other sections, adapt your strategy accordingly and ensure to regularly watch out for any change in trends. In essence, if your personal achievements’ blog was last read several weeks ago, but you have an active debate forum, channel your responses and key messages through the active forum. Ensure that your site caters to all or most age groups and income groups with unique features that they may find interesting. For example, a pensioner may be more interested in a candidate’s take on senior citizens’ healthcare initiatives, while young students may be interested in voicing their opinions about increasing employment prospects. READ MORE
Social Media for Election Campaigns
posted in: Training (Tags: Media) - No Comments
01.02.12 5:16 am
Legal Issues Concerning Cell Phone Jammers
posted in: Introduction (Tags: Jammer) - No Comments
11.04.11 3:17 pm
There are legal issues involved in using and selling cell phone jammers. It is legal with some restrictions in a few countries however, illegal in countries like US, UK, Australia etc. Some of the radiocommunication services that are affected by cell phone jammers are:
Multichannel voice communication that use point-to-point data transmission
Broadcasting links
Studio-to-transmitter links
Cordless telephones
Wireless LANs
Low-power devices
United States of America
Cell phone jammers are illegal in the US. The Federal Communication Commission of United States, outlawed the use and sale of cell phone jammers. The spectrum of the air waves is licensed and using it, is illegal. According to the section 302 a(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, FCC declared that cell phone blocking is illegal. The section 333 of Communications Act of 1934, strictly declares that “no person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communications of any station licensed”. A cell phone jammer is one of the devices mentioned in this act. The main reason why cell phones are made illegal by FCC is because many cell phones are used to call 911 services during emergency. The requirements of Enhanced 911 regulations of FCC “are intended to improve the reliability of wireless 911 services, by requiring wireless carriers to provide emergency dispatchers information on the location from which a wireless call is being made”. However, cell phone jammers are used by police and military forces. If a person in the US, illegally possesses a cell phone jammer, he will fined with $11,000 or 1 year imprisonment. READ MORE
Types of False Imprisonment
posted in: Introduction (Tags: Imprisonment) - No Comments
10.11.11 2:48 am
Any type of action that compromises the liberty of the victim, can be termed as false imprisonment. Depending on the nature of “boundary” or restriction imposed on the victim, cases of false imprisonment come under different types. In most cases of false imprisonment filed in court, the restriction consists of physical boundaries such as an enclosed room with closed doors and windows that the victim is unable to escape from or that the victim is bound to a chair or any other piece of furniture. Sometimes, the perpetrators may use false legal authority to impose boundaries that confine the victim within the restricted area. In simple words, this means that the they pose as lawmakers and threaten hapless people, turning them into victims of false imprisonment. Another way of imposing false imprisonment is by threat, as we saw in the example of the robbers in the bank. Note that false imprisonment does not only include restricting a person within the confines of a building but also modes of transport such as cars and even airplanes.
Exceptions to the Law of False Imprisonment
The laws for false imprisonment have a few exceptions, which means that not every forceful detention is against the law. But why so, you may ask. Well, this is to aid legal procedures and ensure that they are faster. What are they and how in the world do they help the law? Read ahead to find out.
Law enforcement exception
Have you ever seen police personnel detain people who they suspect to have committed a crime? Now, the police do not have sufficient proof against these guys when they arrest them, do they? Yet, if they release them and these people go on to prove guilty later on, it would be next to impossible to find them. It is due to this reason that police have been bestowed with the power to detain people they suspect till the time they are proved innocent. The objective is to prevent the miscreants from escaping the police and the law.
Shopkeeper’s Privilege READ MORE
What are the Types of City Government
posted in: Introduction (Tags: City) - No Comments
08.20.11 5:31 am
The type of local governments varies in different parts of the country. However, most of them have a similar structure, with a central council, which is elected by the voters, an executive officer and heads of the different departments. Although there exists a charter, which talks about the power and objectives of the city government, they have to work in close contact with the state and the federal government. The three different types of city governments are:
•Mayor Council
•Commission
•Council Manager
Mayor Council – Type of City Government
The oldest type of city government is the mayor council kind of government. This city government type apes the state and federal government structure, where there is an elected chief of the executive branch and there exists a council to help the chief with the administration. The heads of the different departments are appointed by the mayor. However, it is the mayor who is the face of the city government. The authority given to the mayor may differ from one city to another. In some cities, the mayor may have the veto powers, with which he will be able to veto laws passed by the council, while in other cities, the mayor will need the approval of the council. Preparing the budget of the city is the task of the mayor. The purview of the city council is the laws governing the local issues.
Commission
As the name suggests a commission comprises of three or more elected members from the city. The legislative as well as the executive functions rest with this group of officials. The laws and ordinances are set and passed by the commission working as one single team. There is a commissioner, who is entrusted with the job of supervising work in one or more city departments. In most cases the commissioner is elected by the voters often with nonpartisan election system. In some cities, a mayor may be elected from the council, but it is merely a decorative or ceremonial post.
Council Manager
The council manager is one of the city government types, where the chief executive officer is not elected, but appointed by the council members. Normally a highly trainer and experienced person is chosen for the job. The policies and ordinances are made by the council, but it is the professional manager who is responsible for implementing the policies. The day to day administration is carried out by the appointed manager. The task of making a budget for the city is the task entrusted to the city manager. The manager holds the post as long as he enjoys the faith of the council, as there is no set term for the manager.
Two-party System
posted in: Arguments (Tags: System) - No Comments
08.09.11 3:14 pm
Clinton: This N.A.F.T.A. thing seems like a great idea to me.
Bush: Hell yeah. Me too.
Clinton: Wow, we have so much in common. We should be friends.
Bush: That sounds awesome. We can turn our beds into bunk beds and then we’ll have so much more room for activities.
Clinton: Good thinking. C’mere and give me a hug.
Bush: Mmmm… You smell good. Is that a mango conditioner?
Clinton: Yes. My new intern loves it.
That other guy who was there: That idea sucks. Someone pay attention to me.
I know what you’re thinking – There are a lot of differences between the two parties. Things like gay rights, the second amendment, and the whole evolution vs. the Flintstonian theory. And you’re right, but what occurred to me then, and what I’ve seen time and again since, is that there is no difference in economic policy between a republican politician and their democratic counterpart. Sure, they talk a different talk, but what do they actually do that is so different? Much like Clinton and Bush in ‘92 regarding N.A.F.T.A. Obama and McCain practically fought over who liked the banking bailout more. Between 2009 and 2011 democrats held the presidency and a majority in both houses of congress. In that time they managed to give billions of dollars to the banking industry and military contractors (because they kept us in Iraq and Afghanistan and the rest of the world), they passed a financial reform bill that was the textbook definition of a paper tiger, and gave us health care reform that put a proverbial band-aid on a gunshot wound.
So when it comes to issues that are emotionally charged and can be debated until the cows come home (i.e. abortion) we have clear divisiveness and ideology, but when it comes to the bottom line – the issues that will really effect normal people on a day to day basis – things that will have an impact on interest rates and the job market – we have complete bi-partisanship. Even if that bi-partisanship comes in the form of faked surrender or underachievement, the result is the same. Sadly, it’s been going on for so long that it’s become cliche – the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.